Pirates who try to justify themselves.

Discussion should include supportive responses.

Moderator: Saria Dragon of the Rain Wilds

User avatar
RinkuTheFirst
Member
Member
Posts: 6093
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 1:00 am
Location: Bamamama
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 111 times

Pirates who try to justify themselves.

#1

Post by RinkuTheFirst » Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:25 am

I wouldn't care that you're stealing something if you would just admit that you are, in fact, stealing something.

User avatar
CaptHayfever
Supermod
Supermod
Posts: 40602
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2002 1:00 am
Location: (n) - the place where I am
Has thanked: 1208 times
Been thanked: 799 times
Contact:

#2

Post by CaptHayfever » Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:08 am

Pirates were among the world's first European-based societies to allow full rights to non-whites & were unique in being democratic seafarers.
...Or were you talking about internet people?

And remember, "I'm-a Luigi, number one!"

User avatar
Deepfake
Member
Member
Posts: 41808
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Enough. My tilde has tired and shall take its leave of you.
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 47 times
Contact:

#3

Post by Deepfake » Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:24 am

Internet piracy is copyright infringement, not theft.
I muttered 'light as a board, stiff as a feather' for 2 days straight and now I've ascended, ;aughing at olympus and zeus is crying

User avatar
Apiary Tazy
Member
Member
Posts: 29598
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2000 1:00 am
Location: Flipping a Switch
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 173 times
Contact:

#4

Post by Apiary Tazy » Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:29 am

I'M NOT STEALING.

I'M ONLY BORROWING (without giving it back, like a neighbor)

User avatar
Deepfake
Member
Member
Posts: 41808
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Enough. My tilde has tired and shall take its leave of you.
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 47 times
Contact:

#5

Post by Deepfake » Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:02 am

Actually, you're only making a lossy copy of the original media at no cost to the original publisher.
I muttered 'light as a board, stiff as a feather' for 2 days straight and now I've ascended, ;aughing at olympus and zeus is crying

User avatar
Bad Dragonite
Member
Member
Posts: 8735
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 7:24 pm
Location: Hetalia
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 20 times
Contact:

#6

Post by Bad Dragonite » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:59 am

I don't see too much wrong with burning a copy of a film you bought, just so long as you don't sell them. Otherwise, yeah, I'd agree with you, it's stealing.
My uncle (I'm still not incredibly comfortable calling him this even tho he's been married to my aunt for almost 10 years..) Has burned hundreds of films while renting them. Every time I look at their collection, I can't help but feel dirty.

He's also a wife beater, and gets too drunk alot, so MOVIE PIRATEZ IZ WIFE BEATARZ AND DRUNKZ.

Actually though, I've downloaded an anime series before, and considered burning it, but only because I plan on purchasing it. And I would NEVER make copies to sell online or off.


But yes, I might consider it equal to stealing. It depends though, I'm not entirely sure what you mean. Do you mean just downloading the film/whatever, or downloading it, making copies, and selling them? (From what I know the latter is usually considered actual pirating, but their are probably mixed opinions on that.)
-I'm Vgfian

User avatar
Deepfake
Member
Member
Posts: 41808
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Enough. My tilde has tired and shall take its leave of you.
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 47 times
Contact:

#7

Post by Deepfake » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:26 am

Well, the problem is the paid distribution of copies of an article you do not own the rights to sell as a reproduction. Making a copy of a file isn't a crime, and this is only an issue of Capitalism protecting Capitalism. Because many of us are skilled, it is easy for us to reproduce a copy of an original product. If I see a pattern carved into a door, I could just as easily create my own version of that pattern on my door. The copyrights owner does not own the right to carving patterns, even that pattern, in a door. The copyrights owner instead owns the right to reproduce that pattern for resale.

Despite what courts may say, there is no way to prove that allowing consumers their own private recreations of audio patterns causes loss to rights holders as it instead is a reasonable competition to their monetary gain. If they're suffering just because audio is too easy to reproduce, it is counter-competitive to attempt to suppress a fringe industry and flourishing privatization, IMO.
I muttered 'light as a board, stiff as a feather' for 2 days straight and now I've ascended, ;aughing at olympus and zeus is crying

User avatar
Valigarmander
Member
Member
Posts: 51366
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: World -1
Has thanked: 119 times
Been thanked: 508 times
Contact:

#8

Post by Valigarmander » Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:01 am

YOU'RE PISSING US OFF AI

User avatar
Booyakasha
Supermod
Supermod
Posts: 21700
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2000 2:00 am
Location: Wisconsinland
Has thanked: 447 times
Been thanked: 2109 times

#9

Post by Booyakasha » Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:41 am

I'm the kind of guy who's really open-handed with his swag. I don't draw a moral distinction between letting a friend borrow a book or movie and cutting someone a copy of a CD. Especially if the CD is really hard to find---I'm not going to keep the awesomeness of Calypso Christmas to myself, and if the copyright holders can't cope with that, well, maybe they should make the CD more readily available to the public.

Oh, and 'yarrrrr'.

(EDIT---I just realised, the CDs I seem to copy most for people are by Capn Dan and the Scuvy Crew (pirate hip-hop) and Alestorm (pirate metal). That's kind of funny if you think about it.)
boo--------------a real american weirdo

User avatar
Calamity Panfan
Member
Member
Posts: 35186
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:00 am
Location: all posters post posts
Has thanked: 124 times
Been thanked: 549 times

#10

Post by Calamity Panfan » Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:40 am

yar har deedly dee
being a pirate is alright with me
do what you want cuz a pirate is free
YOU ARE A PIRATE
and that's the waaaaaaaaaay the news goes

User avatar
Metal Man
Member
Member
Posts: 17964
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 1:00 am
Location: 1592 Miles Away From Here
Contact:

#11

Post by Metal Man » Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:38 pm

Yarrrr.

I don't care for pirating anything, but when the copyright holders be makin' it too hard to get things, well, whataya gonna do? Live your entire life without seein' something because the people who made it went out of business?
Super Smash Quest: Fighting evil since 2002.

User avatar
Ace Mercury
Member
Member
Posts: 23140
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2000 1:00 am

#12

Post by Ace Mercury » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:50 pm

Company's PR firms call copyright infringement "stealing"; you can make the argument that infringement is dampening creativity, etc., but you don't need to conflate the two things. It's not stealing if the original guy still owns the thing you "stole". I believe we agree that stealing is wrong (taking other people's physical property without their permission), but I think that the discussion on copyright infringement is still up in the air.

Related:
https://twitter.com/Mark_S_J/status/17712835866
"If copyright infringement is theft, photographing someone is kidnapping?"
Also, related:
[video]ALZZx1xmAzg[/video]

User avatar
Sim Kid
Member
Member
Posts: 13761
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2001 1:00 am
Location: The state of Denial
Been thanked: 59 times

#13

Post by Sim Kid » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:56 pm

I find some interesting reactions to video game developers complaining about losing sales to piracy:

If it was a well-received game critically that sold well:
Pirates: "You're complaining at US?!? Look how well your game sold? Why should you let THAT bother you?"

If it was a poorly-received game:
Pirates: YOU DON'T DESERVE OUR MONEY FOR THIS!!!

If it was a well-received game that didn't sell that well:
Pirates: *are mysteriously nowhere to be found*



As for the "Internet scanlation piracy" that manga-artists/publishing companies have complained of:

Well gee, you think it's hurting your profits? Well have you ever realized that maybe, some of these mangas whose profits you're "losing" are not available in our country? And even if they are, are probably ungodly rare in bookstores and probably expensive on eBay like Akira or Nausicaä? (Nausicaä is probably printed with paper made from albino redwood trees given how rare it is out here. :| ) If I could actually go out to the bookstore and buy a copy of an Akira book as easily as I could a Naruto collection, I'd certainly do it. Or if there were bigger collections of those longer mangas like Ranma 1/2 or One Piece, it makes it a lot easier to go on archive binge. And yeah, I also know sometimes the scanlations are often done by people who aren't native english speakers, or weren't really proof-read. (I saw a scanlation for Love Hina where the grammar was about as funny as the manga itself. XD There was a part where Keitaro apparently had a temperature of 39.7 degrees Fahrenheit.)

Metal Man wrote: I don't care for pirating anything, but when the copyright holders be makin' it too hard to get things, well, whataya gonna do? Live your entire life without seein' something because the people who made it went out of business?
Or, like I mentioned, unavailable because there were no official publications around there. Like I said, I'd be willing to pay for the Tales of Innocence Manga in a collection if it was actually published outside of Japan.

User avatar
spooky scary bearatons
Member
Member
Posts: 7027
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 12:35 pm
Location: Wales
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

#14

Post by spooky scary bearatons » Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:57 pm

Pffft. If I couldn't pirate it, i wouldn't buy it anyway, thus, no loss to anyone.
"whether you have or have no wealth, the system might fail you, but don't fail yourself" -
GET BETTER - dan le sac Vs Scroobius Pip

User avatar
Greenmarioman
Member
Member
Posts: 18106
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:16 pm
Location: the leather club two blocks down
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

#15

Post by Greenmarioman » Sat Aug 21, 2010 12:09 am

i pirate stuff all the time

deal with it

User avatar
Rainbow Dash
Member
Member
Posts: 25503
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2001 2:00 am
Contact:

#16

Post by Rainbow Dash » Sat Aug 21, 2010 12:43 am

Luigimango wrote:deal with it
Image

User avatar
Deepfake
Member
Member
Posts: 41808
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Enough. My tilde has tired and shall take its leave of you.
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 47 times
Contact:

#17

Post by Deepfake » Sat Aug 21, 2010 1:31 am

Sim Kid wrote:If it was a well-received game critically that sold well:
Pirates: "You're complaining at US?!? Look how well your game sold? Why should you let THAT bother you?"
Well, that argument's a case-by-case thing. PC games do have a smaller market. But when a big dev like Blizzard tries to justify cutting home-multiplayer from a sequel to the third best-selling PC game of all time, that's just wrong. Financially, speaking, the issue actually stems from 3rd party ladder competition. The fans did it better, and the fans did it free. It would make more sense not to try to build a business model around stopping that, and the build a business model instead around supporting that. Look how well it's worked for id Software over the years.

People still pay money for what would be a dead franchise, like the first Doom, to play on fan-provided servers. Just ask Loot - he could've easily grabbed a torrent, but he bought the Steam version instead. He didn't have to do that. Hell, he doesn't even get better support because of it.

But the point is that, if a game like StarCraft sells over 11 million copies, making it the best selling core-game on the PC of all time, and Blizzard's already abandoned it claiming they can't afford to compete with independent servers, what do you think will happen if the fans can't support StarCraft 2 in a decade? There aren't gonna still be sales of it.

Fighting fan support is killing PC games.
I muttered 'light as a board, stiff as a feather' for 2 days straight and now I've ascended, ;aughing at olympus and zeus is crying

User avatar
Jere
Member
Member
Posts: 5595
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: South Lapland
Been thanked: 4 times
Contact:

#18

Post by Jere » Sat Aug 21, 2010 3:52 am

I would not call piracing stealing there is a a big difference after all.

Stealing - Taking something without paying
Piracy - Making a copy of something that you don't own.

I think i have a working policy when it comes to piracy and that's that if i really like the game/movie/album i download i buy them when i get the chance, though i have some exceptions:

1. the game/movie/album in my oppinion was crap
2. It's not officialy realeased in Europe.
3. they are older than 10 years

And i really think that there are more than me that thinks like this, therefore i don't think that: 1 illegally copied product = 1 unselled product, to some extent i can say that it's true, the crap i have avoided buying while doing above mentioned.

So in short I own all the music I have on my harddrive, all the games I play I have a legal copy of, That car is not downloaded from a questionable site and i don't even have a movie on my computer anymore.
Beep Boop absolutely not a bot!

User avatar
Kil'jaeden
Member
Member
Posts: 3878
Joined: Thu May 08, 2003 1:00 am
Location: in your mind
Been thanked: 2 times

#19

Post by Kil'jaeden » Sat Aug 21, 2010 4:09 am

Okay, it's stealing, morally wrong, and I'm going to hell for it. But I'll enjoy doing it anyway.
The man who is blind, deaf,and silent lives in peace.

User avatar
Jere
Member
Member
Posts: 5595
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: South Lapland
Been thanked: 4 times
Contact:

#20

Post by Jere » Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:58 am

Hey if it feels good ,why not doing it?
Beep Boop absolutely not a bot!

Post Reply